Buyer's guide · Updated quarterly
The best AI customer service agents in 2026
An analysis of nine AI agents for customer service, from help-desk add-ons to enterprise platforms, judged on what they can resolve, how they hand over to people and what a resolution costs.

Contents
In brief
The best AI customer service agent depends on where the answers live. For an established company whose support questions can only be resolved with its own orders, invoices and accounts, OpenLazarus is the strongest fit. Intercom Fin is the best choice for adding an agent to an existing help desk and paying per outcome, Zendesk for companies already on Zendesk, Decagon and Sierra for large enterprises, and Gorgias for online stores.
- Support inside company records: OpenLazarus. An AI support agent that acts on orders, invoices and accounts in the same system as the staff, and escalates with full context.
- Any help desk, paid per outcome: Intercom Fin. Works on top of Zendesk, Salesforce and others at $0.99 per outcome.
- Already on Zendesk: Zendesk AI agents. AI agents on messaging, email and voice, billed per automated resolution.
- Enterprise testing and voice: Decagon. Simulations, live experiments and continuous QA, with a named case at Chime.
- Online stores: Gorgias AI Agent. An agent trained on Shopify store data, with published prices.
- Salesforce service teams: Salesforce Agentforce. Agents that act on CRM records, at $2 per conversation.
The decision service leaders face
The case for AI in customer service has moved from chat widgets to agents that resolve issues on their own. Gartner predicted in March 2025 that by 2029 agentic AI would autonomously resolve 80% of common customer service issues without human intervention, leading to a 30% reduction in operational costs1.
The most cited example shows both sides. In February 2024, Klarna reported that its AI assistant had handled 2.3 million conversations in its first month, two-thirds of its customer service chats, doing the equivalent work of 700 full-time agents and cutting the time to resolve an errand from 11 minutes to under two2. In May 2025, its chief executive told Bloomberg that the company was hiring human agents again. AI chatbots had been cheaper, he said, but had produced "lower quality" service, and it was critical to make clear to customers "that there will always be a human if you want"3.
The buying decision is harder than it looks. Vendors price in different units (outcomes, conversations, sessions, automated interactions, seats), define a "resolution" differently, and publish results only from their best customers. And the questions that matter most to customers ("where is my order", "why was I charged twice") can only be answered from records that often sit outside the help desk.
How we evaluated the agents
We reviewed nine AI customer service agents: help-desk vendors with built-in agents, an agent that works on any help desk, enterprise platforms and one operations platform. Each was assessed on the same six criteria, using only what the vendor publishes and reputable third parties report. Every claim links to its source with the date we read it. The criteria and rules are on the methodology page.
The ranking reflects one common situation: an established company whose customers' questions can only be resolved from the records its staff use (orders, invoices, accounts, jobs), and which wants the agent to act on those records rather than only answer. A company in a different situation may be better served by an agent ranked lower, and each profile says when.
The nine agents, ranked
1. OpenLazarus
AI operations platform
Best for: Established companies whose support questions are answered from the same records the business runs on (orders, invoices, accounts, jobs) and that want the support agent working inside them.
OpenLazarus builds a system the company owns, with AI teammates that each have an inbox, a phone number and limits the company sets. Its AI support agent answers from the company’s own knowledge files, checks orders, looks up invoices and updates accounts, and escalates complex cases with the full context.
2. Intercom Fin
AI agent for any help desk
Best for: Companies that want a proven AI agent on their existing help desk, paid only when it resolves a conversation.
Fin is Intercom’s AI agent for customer service. It works with Intercom’s own help desk or with others such as Salesforce, Zendesk, Freshdesk and HubSpot, on voice, chat, email, social and Slack, and is priced per outcome.
3. Zendesk AI agents
Help desk with AI agents
Best for: Companies already on Zendesk that want AI agents inside the same help desk, billed by automated resolution.
Zendesk AI agents converse with customers on messaging, email and voice, perform actions in authorized systems and resolve issues so that human agents can focus on complex work. Usage is measured in automated resolutions, with an allowance included in each plan.
4. Decagon
Enterprise AI agents
Best for: Large consumer brands that want a custom AI agent across voice, chat and email, with strong testing and quality tooling.
Decagon builds AI agents for customer experience across voice, chat and email. Workflows are defined as agent operating procedures, connected through pre-built integrations, and tested with simulations, live A/B experiments and continuous quality review.
5. Sierra
Enterprise AI agents
Best for: Large brands that want one AI agent across every channel, built from their procedures and paid by outcome.
Sierra is a conversational AI platform for businesses. One agent runs across chat, SMS, WhatsApp, email, voice and ChatGPT; an agent-building agent creates it from procedures, transcripts and recordings; and tools for monitoring, experiments and observability track it once live. Pricing is outcome-based.
6. Gorgias AI Agent
E-commerce help desk with AI
Best for: Online stores, especially on Shopify, that want an AI agent trained on store data to handle order and product questions.
Gorgias is a help desk for e-commerce brands. Its AI Agent is trained on the brand’s Shopify store data, help centre and policies, handles product questions, order status, returns and order changes, and hands the rest to the team, with tools to test and optimize it.
7. Salesforce Agentforce
CRM platform with AI agents
Best for: Companies on Salesforce Service Cloud that want customer-facing agents acting on CRM records, priced per conversation or per action.
Agentforce is Salesforce’s platform for AI agents. Customer-facing agents can be bought per conversation, or through Flex Credits drawn by each action an agent takes, such as updating a record or answering a product question.
8. Freshdesk Freddy AI
Help desk with AI agent
Best for: Small and mid-sized support teams that want a help desk with an AI agent included at a low published price.
Freshdesk is Freshworks’ help desk. Every plan includes the Freddy AI Agent with the first 500 sessions; more sessions, a Copilot for agents and connector and MCP actions are sold as add-ons.
9. Ada
Enterprise AI agents
Best for: Enterprises that want an AI agent across voice, messaging and email from a long-established vendor.
Ada sells AI agents for customer service across voice, messaging and email, and says more than 350 global enterprises use it. Its pricing page shows customer logos and a testimonial from Cebu Pacific, but no prices.
OpenLazarus ranks first for this situation because its support agent lives in the same system as those records. Connected to the company's systems, it checks order status, looks up invoices, resets passwords and updates account details, and it escalates billing disputes, technical bugs and upset customers with the full context4. It has no published customer-service case studies yet, and moving support onto a new system is a larger project than adding an agent to an existing help desk.
The agents compared
| Platform | Takes actions | Channels | Handoff to people | Works in company records | Testing and QA | Published pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. OpenLazarus | Yes. Orders, invoices, accounts | Partly. Chat, email, Slack; teammates have phone numbers | Yes. Escalates with full context | Yes. Same system as staff | No. Not described | Yes. Platform price; no per-resolution fee |
| 2. Intercom Fin | Yes. Procedures and integrations | Yes. Voice, chat, email, social | Yes. Procedure handoffs | Partly. Via help desk and integrations | Yes. Train, test, deploy, analyze | Yes. $0.99 per outcome |
| 3. Zendesk AI agents | Yes. Actions in authorized systems | Yes. Messaging, email, voice | Partly. To Zendesk agents | Partly. Within Zendesk and connected systems | —. Not stated on pages read | Partly. Unit published; prices by region |
| 4. Decagon | Yes. Workflows and integrations | Yes. Voice, chat, email | —. Not detailed on pages read | Partly. Through integrations | Yes. Simulations, A/B, QA | No |
| 5. Sierra | Partly. Actions expanding at ADT | Yes. Chat, SMS, WhatsApp, email, voice | —. Not detailed on pages read | Partly. Through integrations | Yes. Monitors, experiments, observability | Partly. Outcome-based; no rates |
| 6. Gorgias AI Agent | Yes. Order edits, returns | Partly. Help desk channels | Yes. Hands to team; handover reports | Partly. Shopify and help desk | Yes. Train, test, deploy, optimize | Yes |
| 7. Salesforce Agentforce | Yes. Updates records, runs flows | Partly. Voice listed; channels vary | —. Not detailed on pages read | Yes. Salesforce CRM objects | —. Not stated on pages read | Yes |
| 8. Freshdesk Freddy AI | Partly. Connector and MCP actions | Partly. Email and help desk channels | —. Not detailed on pages read | Partly. Within Freshdesk and connectors | —. Not stated on pages read | Yes |
| 9. Ada | —. Not detailed on pages read | Yes. Voice, messaging, email | —. Not detailed on pages read | —. Not detailed on pages read | —. Not detailed on pages read | No |
Three patterns stand out. First, the help-desk vendors (Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias) and Salesforce have built agents into their own platforms, which makes adoption easy and switching hard. Second, Intercom Fin is the exception among help-desk vendors: it sells its agent for use on other help desks too5. Third, the enterprise platforms (Decagon, Sierra, Ada) lead on channels and testing but publish no prices.
What the evidence shows
Every figure below is published by the vendor, usually about its best customers.
- Resolution rates. Intercom says Fin customers average a 76% resolution rate across more than 12,000 businesses6. Decagon says Chime reaches about 70% resolution on chat and voice7.
- Cost. Decagon reports a 60% decrease in Chime's customer support costs7. Klarna estimated a $40 million profit improvement in 2024 from its assistant2.
- Scale. Sierra's agent serves ADT, which handles 1.2 million customer inquiries a month8. Decagon says Chime's voice agent scaled past a million calls a month7.
None of these reports how many "resolved" customers came back about the same problem. That is the number to ask every vendor for.
What it costs
| Agent | Pricing unit | Published price |
|---|---|---|
| Intercom Fin | Per outcome | $0.99; 50-outcome monthly minimum on other help desks5 |
| Salesforce Agentforce | Per conversation or per action | $2 per conversation, or $500 per 100,000 Flex Credits9 |
| Gorgias | Per automated interaction | Included allowance, then $1.50 each10 |
| Freshdesk | Per session | 500 included, then $49 per 10011 |
| Zendesk | Per automated resolution | Allowance included per plan12 |
| OpenLazarus | Platform | Plans from $100 a month, hosting from $150, 5.5% on AI credits1314 |
| Sierra | Per outcome | Not published15 |
| Decagon, Ada | Not stated | Not published |
The cost guide works through what these units mean at different volumes.
The path to a working AI agent
- Read a month of tickets. Sort them by reason and by the records needed to resolve each one.
- Pick the reasons the agent can fully resolve with the data it can reach. Start with two or three.
- Write the escalation rules first: what always goes to a person, and what the person receives. Our escalation guide sets out a design.
- Test on past conversations before going live, where the tool allows it.
- Launch on one channel, measure resolution, repeat contacts, satisfaction and escalations for a month.
- Widen by reason, then by channel.
The end state is specific. Routine questions are resolved in minutes at any hour, customers who want a person reach one with their history already on the screen, repeat contacts fall rather than rise, and the support team spends its time on the cases that need judgment.
Questions buyers ask
What is the best AI customer service agent?
It depends on where the answers live. For support that needs the company’s own orders, invoices and accounts, we rank OpenLazarus first. To add an agent to an existing help desk and pay per outcome, Intercom Fin. For Zendesk users, Zendesk AI agents. For large enterprises, Decagon and Sierra. For online stores, Gorgias. For Salesforce service teams, Agentforce.
What is the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?
A chatbot answers questions from scripts or a knowledge base. An AI agent also takes actions in the company’s systems, such as checking an order, issuing a refund or updating an account, and decides when to hand the case to a person. Zendesk, for example, describes its AI agents as performing actions in authorized systems autonomously.
How much does AI customer service cost?
Pricing units differ. Intercom Fin charges $0.99 per outcome. Salesforce Agentforce charges $2 per conversation. Gorgias charges $1.50 per automated interaction beyond its plans. Freshdesk includes 500 AI sessions and sells more at $49 per 100. Zendesk bills per automated resolution. Sierra, Decagon and Ada do not publish prices.
What counts as a resolution?
Each vendor defines it. Intercom counts a resolution when no further help is requested after Fin’s last answer. Zendesk counts requests resolved by an AI agent without escalation to a person. Neither definition confirms that the problem was fixed, so measure repeat contacts as well.
Will AI replace customer service agents?
The evidence argues for a mix. Klarna said in 2024 that its AI assistant handled two-thirds of its customer service chats, the work of 700 full-time agents. In May 2025 its chief executive told Bloomberg it was hiring people again because an AI-first approach had produced lower quality, and that customers should always be able to reach a human.
Can an AI customer service agent answer phone calls?
Several can. Intercom Fin supports voice, Zendesk AI agents work on voice channels, Decagon and Sierra offer voice, and Ada sells a voice product. OpenLazarus teammates each have a phone number.
How should an AI agent hand customers to people?
With rules set in advance and the full context passed on. OpenLazarus’s support agent escalates billing disputes, technical bugs and upset customers with a summary of the issue, the customer’s history and what it tried. Our escalation guide sets out a design.
Sources
- Gartner predicts that agentic AI will solve 80 percent of customer problems by 2029. CX Today, 5 Mar 2025. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Klarna AI assistant handles two-thirds of customer service chats in its first month. Klarna, 27 Feb 2024. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Klarna is hiring customer service agents after AI couldn’t cut it on calls, according to the company’s CEO. Entrepreneur, 9 May 2025. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- AI Support Agent: replace Zendesk, Intercom and Freshdesk. OpenLazarus. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Fin pricing. Intercom. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Fin: the AI agent for customer service. Intercom. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Chime scales member support with AI-powered automation. Decagon. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- How ADT embraces AI to make every second count. Sierra. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Agentforce pricing. Salesforce. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Gorgias pricing. Gorgias. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Freshdesk pricing. Freshworks. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- About AI agents. Zendesk Help. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Questions about OpenLazarus. OpenLazarus. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Pricing. OpenLazarus. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
- Better customer experiences. Sierra. Accessed 8 Nov 2026.
Updated 8 Nov 2026: First published. Nine AI agents reviewed against six criteria.